La tunisie Medicale - 2021 ; Vol 99 ( n°012 ) : 1134-1140
[ 3188 times seen ]

Introduction: Medical mobile applications are increasing, accessible and easy leading to a considerable increase use by physicians.
Aim: To assess the contribution of mobile applications to medical learning and practice among medical residents.
Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out during May and June 2021, via an anonymous questionnaire, published online focusing on the contribution of medical applications in the learning and the daily life of medical interns.
Results: We collected 134 responses completed by interns in all specialties. The mean age was 28 ± 2.04 years with a predominance of women (gender ratio = 0.39). The average number of years of experience was 4.52 ± 2.5 semesters. All interns had smartphones and 56.7%. Only 3% had no applications on their smartphones and 62.7% had between two and four applications. The most used applications were communication and scoring applications.  several advantages of these applications were noted, mainly assistance in therapeutic management (85.1%), diagnosis (76.9%) and communication (69.4%). However, limitations were mainly the lack of 3G / 4G coverage. For scientific research, the most used search engine were Google, Google Scholar and Pub Med. One hundred and six residents (79.1%) were satisfied with the contribution of applications to learning and 61 wished to have training in the specific use of the smartphone.
Conclusion: Communication, diagnostic or management help mobile applications have become unavailable in daily practice but also in learning. However, this new mode of instruction must be associated to the classical education.

Key - Words
  1. 1. Schuwirth LWT, Vleuten CPM van der. Challenges for educationalists. BMJ 2006;333:544‑6. 2. Jones SS, Rudin RS, Perry T, Shekelle PG. Health Information Technology: An Updated Systematic Review With a Focus on Meaningful Use. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:48‑54. 3. Abachi HR, Muhammad G. The impact of m-learning technology on students and educators. Comput Hum Behav 2014;30:491‑6. 4. Klímová B. Mobile Learning in Medical Education. J Med Syst 2018;42(10):194. 5. Abbasi S, Ayoob T, Malik A, Memon SI. Perceptions of students regarding E-learning during Covid-19 at a private medical college. Pak J Med Sci 2020;36:57‑61. 6. NW 1615 L. St, Suite 800Washington, Inquiries D 20036USA202-419-4300 | M-857-8562 | F-419-4372 | M. Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018 [Internet]. Pew Research Center. [cité 24 nov 2020]. Disponible sur: 7. Statistiques mondiales sur le mobile en 2021 [Internet]. Zenu Académie. 2019 [cité 6 juill 2021]. Disponible sur: 8. Médecins : nombre d’applis médicales utilisées France 2015 [Internet]. Statista. [cité 6 juill 2021]. Disponible sur: 9. Masson E. L’usage des applications médicales mobiles chez les médecins internes du Centre hospitalier universitaire Ibn Rochd Casablanca, Maroc [Internet]. EM-Consulte. [cité 6 juill 2021]. Disponible sur: médecins-internes-du-Centre-hospitalier-universitaire-Ibn-Rochd-Casablanca-Maroc. 10. Muzzolini VH. Utilisation des smartphones en médecine générale en Picardie. 27 avr 2016 [these].Picardie: Université de JULES VERNE; 2016. 11. Sherwin-Smith J, Pritchard-Jones R. Medical Applications: The Future of Regulation. Bull R Coll Surg Engl. 1 janv 2012;94(1):12‑3. 12. PubMed [Internet]. PubMed. [cité 7 juill 2021]. Disponible sur: 13. Yadalla HKK, Shankar MV. Professional usage of smart phone applications in medical practice. Int J Health Allied Sci 2012;1(2):44. 14. Les 3 meilleurs moteurs de recherche académiques pour chercheurs et étudiants [Internet]. Archimag. [cité 7 juill 2021]. Disponible sur: 15. De Leo G, LeRouge C, Ceriani C, Niederman F. Websites Most Frequently Used by Physician for Gathering Medical Information. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:902. 16. Wang L, Wang J, Wang M, Li Y, Liang Y, Xu D. Using Internet Search Engines to Obtain Medical Information: A Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(3):e1943. 17. Sangaré M. Utilisation des technologies mobiles (téléphones cellulaires et tablettes) comme support d’apprentissage par les étudiants en médecine [Internet] [Thesis]. USTTB; 2019 [cité 10 juill 2021]. Disponible sur: 18. Barsaoui M, Riahi H. Apport de l’outil « socrative » dans l’apprentissage médical. Tun Med 2021;99(4) :399‑403. 19. Hardyman W, Bullock A, Brown A, Carter-Ingram S, Stacey M. Mobile technology supporting trainee doctors’ workplace learning and patient care: an evaluation. BMC Med Educ 2013;13(1):6. 20. O’Neill S, Brady RRW. Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risks. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 2012;14(9):530-534. 21. Masson E. Les acteurs de la régulation du système de santé [Internet]. EM-Consulte. [cité 8 juill 2021]. Disponible sur: 22. Dmd Santé lance mHealth Quality, label européen en santé mobile et connectée [Internet]. [cité 8 juill 2021]. Disponible sur: 23. Masika MM, Omondi GB, Natembeya DS, Mugane EM, Bosire KO, Kibwage IO. Use of mobile learning technology among final year medical students in Kenya. Pan Afr Med J [Internet]. 2015 [cité 8 juill 2021];21(1). Disponible sur: 24. Briz-Ponce L, Juanes-Méndez JA, García-Peñalvo FJ, Pereira A. Effects of Mobile Learning in Medical Education: A Counterfactual Evaluation. J Med Syst. 2016;40(6):136. 25. Masters K, Al-Rawahi Z. The use of mobile learning by 6th-year medical students in a minimally-supported environment. Int J Med Educ 2012;3:92‑7.
E-mail :
Password :
Remember Me Forgot password? Sign UP
Keywords most used
Child treatment diagnosis surgery Tunisia prognosis Children Crohn’s disease Breast cancer Cancer screening epidemiology Ulcerative colitis Risk factors prevention
Sign up to receive our newsletter
E-mail :
Stay in Touch
Join Us! !