La tunisie Medicale - 2021 ; Vol 99 ( n°06 ) : 652-661
[ 1105 times seen ]

Introduction The study of the anatomy of the extra hepatic bile ducts has demonstrated the existence of a significant number of variants which can be explained by hepato-biliary embryology. A good knowledge of this anatomy is essential for the interpretation of radiological examinations, and for a good practice of hepato-biliary and pancreatic surgery. Several imaging methods are used to study the anatomy of the bile ducts, including classical cholangiography, which is still practiced and very useful.
Aim: To study the modal anatomy (the most frequent) and the anatomical variants of the extrahepatic bile ducts through the interpretation of postoperative cholangiograms and to examine their implication on the surgical practice.
Methods: This is a monocentric, retrospective observational study. It concerned any patient who underwent hepato-biliary or pancreatic surgery at the Department of General and Digestive Surgery of Farhat Hached University Hospital of Sousse between 2007 and 2016, and who received postoperative cholangiography. A data form was fulfilled for each patient.
Results: Out of a total population of 293 patients, we identified 158 patients (53.9%) with anatomic variants of the extrahepatic bile ducts. The common bile duct was modally implanted in the second duodenum in 96.2% of cholangiographies and in the genu inferius in 3.8% of cases. The main pancreatic duct had a V-shaped implantation in 87.1% of cholangiograms, a U-shaped implantation in 4.2% of cases and a Y-shaped implantation in 7.1% of cases. The common bile duct had a modal aspect in 71.3% of cholangiograms, with 28.7% of anatomic variants, organized in 4 models. The cystic duct had a modal presentation in 80.9% of cases, and we recorded 6 other branching models (19.1% of cases). No significant difference was observed between the presence of anatomic variants on the one hand, and age, sex, conversion rate, intraoperative incidents, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay and overall hospital stay on the other hand.
Conclusion: Conventional cholangiography constitutes a more or less precise tool for detecting these anatomic variants and is therefore very useful in the practice of hepato-biliary surgery even after the advent of new techniques in this field. However, it also requires a more extensive and in-depth knowledge of these anatomic variants, which nevertheless remain quite frequent, and represent a source of surgical difficulties.

Key - Words
  1. 1- Couinaud C. Le foie. Etudes natomiques et chirurgicales. Paris : Masson & Cie, 1957. 2- Huang TL, Cheng YF, Chen CL, Chen TY, Lee TY. Variants of the bile ducts: clinical application in the potential donor of living-related hepatic transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1996;28: 1669–70. 3- Champetier J. Les voies biliaires. Anat. Clin. Tronc, Paris: Springer; 1994, p. 416–7. 4- Kitami M, Takase K, Murakami G, Ko S, Tsuboi M, Saito H, et al. Types and frequencies of biliary tract variations associated with a major portal venous anomaly: analysis with multi-detector row CT cholangiography. Radiology. 2006;238: 156–66. 5- Ohkubo M, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Yuasa N, Oda K, Arai T, et al. Surgical Anatomy of the Bile Ducts at the Hepatic Hilum as Applied to Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Ann Surg. 2004;239: 82–6. 6- Karakas HM, Celik T, Alicioglu B. Bile duct anatomy of the Anatolian Caucasian population: Huang classification revisited. Surg Radiol Anat LA TUNISIE MEDICALE - 2021 ; Vol 99 (n°06) 661 2008;30: 539–45. 7- Jarrar MS , Masmoudi M, Mraidha MH, Naouar N, Barka M, Youssef S, et al. Anatomic variations of the upper biliary confluence and intrahepatic ducts in East-central Tunisian population. Ital J Anat Embryol. 2019;124(3): 487-98. 8- Jarrar MS, Khenissi A, Ghrissi R, Hamila F, Letaief R. Ansa pancreatica: an anatomic variation and a rare cause of acute pancreatitis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(8): 745-8. 9- Jurkovikj D. Some Anatomic-Topographic Features of Common and Right Hepatic Ducts and their Constituents. Maced J Med Sci. 2011;4(1): 44-53. 10- Hayes MA, Goldenberg IS, Bishop CC. The developmental basis for bile duct anomalies. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1958;107: 447–56. 11- Lamah M, Karanjia ND, Dickson GH. Anatomical variations of the extrahepatic biliary tree: Review of the world literature. Clin Anat. 2001;14: 167–72. 12- Ando H. Embryology of the Biliary Tract. Dig Surg. 2010;27: 87–9. 13- Roskams T, Desmet V. Embryology of Extra- and Intrahepatic Bile Ducts, the Ductal plate. Anat Rec Adv Integr Anat Evol Biol. 2008;291: 628–35. 14- Van Eyken P, Sciot R, Callea F, Van der Steen K, Moerman P, Desmet VJ. The development of the intrahepatic bile ducts in man: a keratinimmunohistochemical study. Hepatol Baltim Md. 1988;8: 1586–95. 15- Elhjouji A, Ali AA, Alahyane A, El Khader A, Baba H, Oueldjeddou C, et al. Variations anatomiques des voies biliaires et conséquences chirurgicales: à propos de 19 cas. J Afr Hépatol Gastroenterol. 2009;3: 137–42. 16- Abdelgawad MS, Eid M. Biliary tract variants in potential right lobe living donors for liver transplantation: Evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2012;43: 53–7. 17- Barsoum NR, Samie AA, Adel L, Asaad RE. Role of MRCP in assessment of biliary variants in living donor liver transplantation. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2013;44: 131–6. 18- Choi JW, Kim TK, Kim KW, Kim AY, Kim PN, Ha HK, et al. Anatomic variation in intrahepatic bile ducts: an analysis of intraoperative cholangiograms in 300 consecutive donors for living donor liver transplantation. Korean J Radiol. 2003;4: 85–90. 19- Cucchetti A, Peri E, Cescon M, Zanello M, Ercolani G, Zanfi C, et al. Anatomic variations of intrahepatic bile ducts in a European series and meta-analysis of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15: 623–30. 20- Deka P, Islam M, Jindal D, Kumar N, Arora A, Negi SS. An analysis of biliary anatomy according to different classification systems. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2014;33: 23–30. 21- Tashiro S, Imaizumi T, Ohkawa H, Okada A, Katoh T, Kawaharada Y, et al. Pancreaticobiliary maljunction: retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10: 345–51. 22- Kamisawa T, Takuma K, Anjiki H, Egawa N, Kurata M, Honda G, et al. Pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2009;7: S84-88. 23- Renard Y, Sommacale D, Avisse C, Palot JP, Kianmanesh R. Anatomie chirurgicale des voies biliaires extrahépatiques et de la jonction biliopancréatique. EMC - Tech Chir - Appar Dig. 2014;9(3) :1-21 24- Mortelé KJ, Ros PR. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: MR cholangiographic findings and clinical applications. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177: 389–94. 25- Blidaru D, Blidaru M, Pop C, Crivii C, Seceleanu A. The common bile duct: size, course, relations. Romanian J Morphol Embryol Rev Roum Morphol Embryol. 2010;51 :141–4. 26- Catalano OA, Singh AH, Uppot RN, Hahn PF, Ferrone CR, Sahani DV. Vascular and biliary variants in the liver: Implications for liver surgery. RadioGraphics. 2008;28: 359–78. 27- Ayuso JR, Ayuso C, Bombuy E, De Juan C, Llovet JM, De Caralt TM, et al. Preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy in adult live liver donors with volumetric mangafodipir trisodium enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography: MRC Evaluation of Biliary Anatomy in LLDs. Liver Transpl. 2004;10: 1391–7. 28- Jarrar MS, Fourati A, Fadhl H, Youssef S, Mahjoub M, Khouadja H, et al. Risk factors of conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomies for lithiasic acute cholecystitis. Results of a monocentric study and review of the literature. Tunis Med. 2019;97(2): 344-51. 29- Hu ASY, Donohue PO, Gunnarsson RK, de Costa A. External validation of the Cairns Prediction Model (CPM) to predict conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2018;216(5) :949-54. 30- Uchiyama K, Tani M, Kawai M, Ueno M, Hama T, Yamaue H. Preoperative evaluation of the extrahepatic bile duct structure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2006;20: 1119–23
E-mail :
Password :
Remember Me Forgot password? Sign UP
Keywords most used
Child treatment diagnosis surgery prognosis Tunisia Children Crohn’s disease Breast cancer Cancer screening epidemiology Ulcerative colitis Risk factors Osteoporosis
Sign up to receive our newsletter
E-mail :
Stay in Touch
Join Us! !